
The assurance of a lawyer with the impact of an HR professional
Geert Jan Eissens combines 25 years of experience as HR director, compensation & benefits expert, and employment lawyer. He has supported both multinationals and startups in building fair, compliant, and motivating reward systems. He's a trusted advisor for the human side of equity.
Sometimes a Virtual Share Plan raises questions that touch broader HR or legal topics. Geert Jan helps you bridge these areas with practical, business-focused advice.
Work with Geert Jan as a sparring partner to clarify concepts, review your setup, and confirm it aligns with your goals and structure.
See how your Virtual Share Plan fits within your overall compensation approach, keeping salary, bonuses, and long-term rewards in balance.
Help employees understand the plan and feel genuinely motivated by it. Geert Jan can act as an independent intermediary to build trust and clarity.
Get help explaining your plan clearly to investors, advisors, or works councils. Prepare a future acquisition by communicating the plan payoff.
Get advice when people join, leave, or take on new roles to keep your plan up to date. Outsource the administrative and legal part, if you want to.
Handle questions or conflicts calmly and professionally with guidance from an experienced HR and legal expert.
"I want to relieve companies of their stress by solving complex HR and labour law issues. My goal is to add value, inspire, and help organisations grow successfully." - Geert Jan Eissens
This article was originally published on HRmagazine.
There are several ways to set up financial employee participation. The key is that this form of rewarding must fit the company. In this article, reward expert Geert Jan Eissens discusses strategic questions that help guide an effective reward policy for growing businesses such as startups and scale-ups.
Let's start from the broader, existing reward policies that many organisations already have in place. Even startups and scale-ups usually begin with basic salaries linked to roles, commuting allowances, training budgets, and in some cases, pension schemes.
In many cases, there is little deliberate thought behind a reward policy, and companies look at what neighbouring firms or peer startups are doing. The focus is often elsewhere, employees are generally enthusiastic, and smaller companies rarely have a real strategic HR policy.
But how much of a problem is that? Reward is often seen as a strategic tool to guide employees in the right direction. A company has a mission and a strategy for achieving it. Employees carry out that strategy. Larger companies usually have a comprehensive HR strategy with multiple tools to help achieve goals. Reward is one of these tools: it can motivate, increase engagement, and ultimately improve performance.
Reward as a distribution method
Growing companies usually have fewer resources, but far more flexibility to define their own course. At its core, reward is not only about motivation, job satisfaction, happiness, or attracting and retaining talent. Reward is first and foremost a distribution mechanism (a basic condition). The challenge lies in tapping into intrinsic motivation to retain employees, contribute to their job satisfaction, and encourage them to perform.
Three key drivers of job satisfaction
As Daniel Pink described in his book Drive (2011), the three main drivers of satisfaction are: Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose. In other words, give employees freedom to do their work, focus on their development, and encourage growth. Purpose—why the company exists—is increasingly important, especially for younger employees. Meaning, social contribution, and sustainable goals are often leading factors in choosing an employer.
More space for HR strategy in startups and scale-ups
Startups and scale-ups often have much more freedom to define their own HR strategies and to create a "Great Place to Work." These companies frequently pursue a mission and a broader societal goal. While financial results like EBITDA and ROI remain important, they are not the only driver.
Why consider employee participation?
There are several clear reasons for introducing employee participation as a reward tool, as the Dutch Social and Economic Council (SER) has long encouraged. For growing companies, the main motives are:
For this tool to work, companies need to invest in it and implement it well. When introduced properly, participation plans often lead to positive results. Financial employee participation is not a trick or a guarantee. The conviction that matters is that success comes from combining employee talent with insight into how the business runs. This explains why countries like France, Germany, Scandinavia, and the UK embraced these plans years ago, partly because their tax systems are more employee-friendly.
Investors
Encouragingly, more startups and scale-ups are embracing participation*. This makes sense, since investors (private equity and venture capital) are key stakeholders and create leverage to accelerate growth. Platforms like Eyevestor also stimulate share-based funding and participation.
Conditions for success and sustainability
Any participation plan must balance four elements:
*Common forms of participation include shares (often via a STAK), share options, virtual shares (SARs), and profit-sharing (cash bonuses).
Considerations
In summary, participation plans can be highly effective for growing companies. They are not a guarantee for success, but when they fit the company's HR strategy, they can add real value. Employers should be aware of potential pitfalls, such as:
Learn about virtual shares and create an own plan, risk-free and without hassle.
We use cookies to optimize your experience. We use analytical and tracking cookies for this. Cookie Statement.